Legal Opinion
Anne Arundel County v. Halle Development, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 6, 2009No. 59, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The respondents in this appeal, Halle Development, Inc., et al., are representative plaintiffs in a class action of current property owners (“the Owners”) that seek to recover development impact fees collected by Anne Arundel County, Maryland (“the County”), petitioner, for the fiscal years 1988 through 1996. The Circuit Court determined that because (1) $4,719,359 in impact fees 1 collected from property owners were not thereafter timely paid or encumbered for capital improvements within the applicable district, and (2) the period to make capital improvements was not properly…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Andrews v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Green v. Pro Football, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.