Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Luz v. Stop & Shop, Inc. of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1964PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon', J.

These four actions of tort arose out of the same happening and were tried together with companion actions brought by the same plaintiffs against Ethel J. and Carmen Bianco. The declarations, which are similar in the four cases now before us, allege that on June 26, 1958, the defendant’s negligence in the operation and maintenance of premises under its control resulted in injuries to the plaintiffs. In each case, Stop & Shop, Inc. (Stop & Shop) answered with a general denial and an allegation of contributory negligence. In all except the Hardy case the further defence of assumption of the risk…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Commonwealth v. CrehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Comey v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Zezuski v. Jenny Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API