Ross v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. The action is one in form to recover damages against the defendant Mark Lane as a notary public and against the defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a corporation, as the surety upon his official bond, in the sum of $650 alleged to have been sustained through the official misconduct and negligence of said defendant Mark Lane as a notary public in the course of the following transaction as set forth in the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Homan v. Wayer320California Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ryan v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hemet Home Builders Association v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Iselin-Jefferson Financial Co. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. State Ex Rel. StangelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Bank of StocktonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.