Legal Opinion

Ross v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1922No. Civ. No. 3973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. The action is one in form to recover damages against the defendant Mark Lane as a notary public and against the defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a corporation, as the surety upon his official bond, in the sum of $650 alleged to have been sustained through the official misconduct and negligence of said defendant Mark Lane as a notary public in the course of the following transaction as set forth in the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Homan v. Wayer320California Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Hemet Home Builders Association v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Iselin-Jefferson Financial Co. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. State Ex Rel. StangelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Bank of StocktonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API