McAllister v. C. H. Clement
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
—This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged official misconduct or neglect of a notary public. The material facts of the case are as follows:—
In 1883 the defendant, C. H. Clement, was a notary *183public for San Luis Obispo County, and "the other defendants were the sureties on his official bond. On the fourteenth day of April of that year, one W. A. Cook made to the plaintiff his promissory note for six hundred dollars, payable six months after date, with interest, and on the same day, to secure the payment of the note, executed to plaintiff a mortgage upon a crop…
2Cited by26 opinions
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fogleman v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- White v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.