Legal Opinion

Iselin-Jefferson Financial Co. v. United California Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. L.A. 30551PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

In this case we consider whether a notary public may be liable to a purchaser of accounts receivable for negligently acknowledging a forged signature on a guaranty agreement. We have concluded that liability may be imposed despite the potential insolvency of the person whose signature was forged.

The case was tried upon stipulated facts which are substantially as follows: On January 18, 1971, Iselin-Jefferson Financial Company (plaintiff) agreed for $76,001.48 to purchase from Rothchild Bros. Textiles, Inc. (Rothchild) accounts receivable due Rothchild from Robert S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hemet Home Builders Association v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Ross v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Garton v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API