Legal Opinion

Gerhard v. Boston Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1951No. 9626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

At the conclusion of the trial the jury in the instant case returned a special verdict in the form of answers to the interrogatories which had been submitted to it by the court under Fed. Rules. Civ.Proc. rule 49(a), 28 U.S.C.

The plaintiff then moved for judgment on the special verdict, whereupon the defendant moved to set aside the special verdict, for a new trial and for judgment.

The within action had been inaugurated by the plaintiff’s suit on an insurance policy issued by the defendant and countersigned n Philadelphia.

The policy is designated “Jewelry-Fur…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bole v. New Hampshire Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Oil MillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Patriotic Ins. Co. of America v. FranciscusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Borden v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jim Clark v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Naiman v. Niagara Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. United States v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API