Naiman v. Niagara Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.
Plaintiff insured her jewelry and furs with defendant insurance company against all risks of loss or damage, with certain specified exceptions irrelevant to the issues in this case. The policy states that defendant insured plaintiff “ for the sum of Fifty One Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars; * * * as per schedule attached or as scheduled below ”. Attached to the policy is a schedule listing and describing seventeen items of jewelry and six items of fur, and allocating a specified amount of the aggregate insurance for each article. Before insuring these articles defendant required…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Auerbach v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Borden v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Michael v. Prussian National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zuraff v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Weissblum v. Glens Falls InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
- Hertz Corp. v. CorcoranNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Nichols v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Iannucci v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.