Legal Opinion

Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2000PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerBarker, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and BIRCH, J., and HOLDER, J., joined.

The primary issue in this workers’ compensation direct appeal is whether the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s findings that the appellant is 20% permanently and partially disabled. We are also asked to decide whether the appellant is entitled to an additional period of temporary total disability benefits after she made a nominal return to work but later resigned because of pain associated with her original injury. This case was argued before the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel on August 13, 1999,…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Simpson v. SatterfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Seals v. England/Corsair Upholstery Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. BinetteTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gray v. Cullom MacHine, Tool & Die, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Saylor v. Lakeway Trucking, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Whirlpool Corp. v. Ketkeo NakhoneinhTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. George v. Building Materials Corp. of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API