Continental Volvo, Inc. v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This is a controversy between Safeco Insurance Company of America and Insurance Management Underwriters of Federated American Insurance Company over responsibility for liability insurance coverage. The question arose when Leon J. and Sally Ross, who had purchased but not received delivery of a new car from Continental Volvo, Inc., were involved in an accident while driving a temporary substitute vehicle furnished by Continental Volvo. The Rosses' policy of insurance with Federated American contained the following provision:
Other Insurance—Coverages A, B, C, D, E and F. If the insured has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Aetna Insurance v. KentWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Morrison v. Anchor Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Landreth v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DarchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Safeco Insurance v. Automobile Club InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Safeco of Illinois v. Automobile Club Ins.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.