Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gentry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1896No. 258PublishedCited by 135 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEARS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant railway company, the present plaintiff in error, resulting in the death of Louis D. Gentry. It was brought in the Circuit Court of Dallas County, Texas, and was removed into the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas on the petition of the defendant, a corporation created under acts of Congress.

The deceased left surviving him his mother, the plaintiff Mary A. Gentry, seventy-five years old, and dependent upon him for support; his wife, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Michael G. Gilman v. Bhc Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API