Legal Opinion

Feld v. Kantrowitz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 26, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The precise question to be determined on this, appeal is whether the learned vice-chancellor erred in refusing an injunction pending final hearing, and in vacating an ad interim, restraint awarded when the bill was filed, upon the coming in of answers and answering affidavits. As will appear by a reading of his opinion, the general case made by the bill of complaint was that the complainant, Feld, was the owner of a one-sixth undivided interest in a contract to purchase real estate, but that his interest was not manifested on the face' of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Jersey City Merchants Council v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Eckman v. BeihlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Martinique Realty Corp. v. HullNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API