Legal Opinion

Martinique Realty Corp. v. Hull

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 29, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

64 N.J. Super. 599 (1960)

166 A.2d 803

THE MARTINIQUE REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

REGINALD B. HULL AND MARY HULL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 21, 1960.

Decided December 29, 1960.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.

Mr. Richard E. Cherin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Lieblich & Cole, attorneys; Mr. Herbert A. Vogel, of counsel).

Mr. Roger Friedbauer argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Friedbauer & Friedbauer, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clarke v. . Eighth Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Wood v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Hinners v. BanvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Longi v. Raymond-Commerce Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Kirkeby Corp. v. Cross Bridge Towers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Green Mountain Bank v. BruehlSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API