Legal Opinion

Citizens' Street Railroad v. Hobbs

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1896No. 1,771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The appellee sued appellant, and recovered a judgment against it for personal injuries, received while a passenger on one of appellant’s street cars in the city of Indianapolis, and through the alleged negligence of the appellant. One of the errors assigned is the overruling of the appellant’s demurrer *612to the complaint. • This alleged error does not seem to be relied upon very confidently by the appellant’s counsel. We have examined the complaint, however, and think it is sufficient.

The principal contention arises upon the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial, assigned as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Grubb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. City of Goshen v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hutchinson v. LemckeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donovan v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Viou v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Cromer v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Ewing v. DuncanIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lofland v. GobenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API