Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio S. W. Ry. Co. v. Keck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 5, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Martin M. Schaefer, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant. Heard in this court at the February term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Worthington

delivered the opinion of the court. '

Suit for personal injuries.

The declaration contains six counts. The third count charges wanton and willful negligence. The gist of the other counts, after the usual allegations of operating a railway, etc., are, in substance, that Philip Keck, the father of George Keck, a boy about fourteen years old, residing with his father, lived on a farm which appellant’s road crossed in an east and west line; that over a private way, leading from Philip Keck’s house, north of the railway track, to the highway on the south side of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. ScheiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. North Chicago Street Railroad v. FitzgibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. LatimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. WillenborgIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. PenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. SiemannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Williams v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  4. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. U. P. R. R. Co. v. SiemannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API