Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Siemann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 1944No. 15,225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court. Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as the company, defendant in error as plaintiff, and her deceased husband as Siemann.

In the midafternoon of November 10, 1941, Siemann was traveling east on a private road which crossed the company’s railway track. Its engine with a caboose attached was traveling north on that track. At the crossing a collision occurred in which Siemann was fatally injured. Plaintiff brought this suit against the company to recover damages in the sum of $2,999 for her husband’s death. On a verdict for her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Westerkamp v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. KeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Baltimore & Ohio S. W. Ry. Co. v. KeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. BarthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Welsh v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Welsh v. U.P.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API