Dorothy Carlson v. The Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Glendenning Companies, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*280OPINION
Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.*
ELY, Circuit Judge:
Acting individually and, purportedly as class representatives, appellants initiated this action against The Coca-Cola Company for damages. The complaint alleged that Coca-Cola had engaged in a nationwide promotional game, Big Name Bingo, that was deceptively structured to deprive many participants of prize money to which they were allegedly entitled under the rules of the game. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the District Court, 318 F.Supp. 785, dismissed the complaint for failing to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Samson Crane Co. v. Union Nat. Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Kevin Naylor v. Case and McGrath Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- George J. Fulton v. Isadore HechtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.