Legal Opinion
Scott v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1927No. Docket No. 5557PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.
The present proceeding is one by which it is asked that a peremptory writ of mandate be directed to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The proceeding in the superior court was one of a similar character, by which it was sought to compel the board of education to reinstate the petitioner as a teacher in the public schools of the city of Long Beach.
The petition before us alleges that petitioner is a permanent teacher in the public schools of said city, as defined in section 1609 of the Political Code; that she was wrongfully dismissed from that position by the board of education of Long…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- People ex rel. Gesford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hotchkiss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Green v. HebbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Scannell v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.