Legal Opinion

Van Noy v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1953No. 35725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This action was commenced by C. W. Van Noy, hereinafter called plaintiff, to obtain a judgment for damages for the loss of a horse and for personal injuries sustained to plaintiff alleging such damages resulted from a collision between a horse ridden by plaintiff and an automobile driven by Luther James Buchanan, hereinafter called defendant. At the conclusion of the trial the trial court sustained a motion for directed verdict. The verdict was returned and judgment entered thereon.

The sole issue in this appeal is the error of the court in directing a verdict for defendant.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. GraneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Layman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API