In the Interest of C.L.P. v. Pate
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELLIVER, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County involving the termina*19tion of parental rights. The sole issue before us is whether § 211.447.2(2)(i)b, RSMo Cum.Supp.1983,1 is unconstitutional on its face. The trial court held that the language of this subsection of § 211.447 is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. We reverse.
Appellant, the juvenile officer of Jefferson County, filed petitions for terminating the parental rights of the natural parents of C.L.P., R.M.P., and D.L.S. Respondent Charlotte…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Prokopf v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In the Interest of D.L.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- In the Interest of LGSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Juvenile Officer of Howard County v. B.J.G.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- In the Interest of G.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gannett Outdoor Co. of Kansas City v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.