Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.L.P. v. Pate

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 17, 1984No. 65334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County involving the termina*19tion of parental rights. The sole issue before us is whether § 211.447.2(2)(i)b, RSMo Cum.Supp.1983,1 is unconstitutional on its face. The trial court held that the language of this subsection of § 211.447 is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. We reverse.

Appellant, the juvenile officer of Jefferson County, filed petitions for terminating the parental rights of the natural parents of C.L.P., R.M.P., and D.L.S. Respondent Charlotte…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Prokopf v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.L.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In the Interest of LGSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Juvenile Officer of Howard County v. B.J.G.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In the Interest of G.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Kansas City v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API