Prokopf v. Whaley
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Judge.
The Board of Police Commissioners found Officer Prokopf in violation of Rule 9, Sec-' tion 9.037 of its Police Manual and suspended him for fourteen days without pay. The circuit court without findings or conclusions reversed the Board and directed reinstatement with back pay. The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirmed the judgment on a determination that:
“Where, as here, the rule was not offered or introduced at the administrative hearing, an appellate court . . . may not take judicial notice of the rules of the administrative agency. * * * Without the introduction of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- BD. OF ED., MT. VERNON SCHOOLS, ETC. v. ShankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Hanebrink v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- General Motors Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Division of the Council on Human Relations of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.