Legal Opinion
In the Interest of G.S.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1987No. 52085PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
This is a consolidation of appeals of judgments terminating the parental rights of appellants (father and mother) to three of their minor children. We affirm.
Father and mother assert the unconstitutional application of §§ 211.351.1 and 211.447.1, RSMo 1986 denied them a right to trial before a fair and impartial judge. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982).
Section 211.351.1 states in part: A juvenile court shall appoint a juvenile officer ... to serve under the direction of the court....
Section 211.447.1 provides for the filing by the juvenile…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Moore v. StampsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- In the Interest of C.L.P. v. PateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Livingston v. V.L.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bradley v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Interest of K.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- In Re KCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003