Legal Opinion

Julie Sigwart v. U.S. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 8, 2017No. 14-16346UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Julie M. Sigwart (“Sigwart” or “Appellant”) appeals the district court’s rulings dismissing with prejudice the wrongful foreclosure claims she asserted against U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) (collectively, “Foreclosing Entities” or “Appellees”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE and REMAND in part.

Í. Appellees argue the notice-and-cure provision in Sigwart’s mortgage agreement precludes her from asserting all claims for unfair or deceptive acts and practices (“UDAP”), Haw. Rev.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Santiago v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hungate v. Law Office of David B. RosenHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Watoshina Compton v. Countrywide Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Eric Podwall v. William Smokey Robinson, Jr.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. Reyna v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API