Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Gatlin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 16, 1979No. 2600-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

The defendant, Howard Gatlin, appeals from a judgment holding him liable as a guarantor on a $4,000 promissory note payable to the plaintiff, Dr. Walter Lutz.

On March 10, 1972, Dr. Lutz loaned $4,000 to Design Specialties, Inc. (Design) for 90 days. Design was a Washington corporation in which Mr. Gatlin held a one-third interest. Design was the sole owner of Centaur Inn of Eureka (Centaur), a California corporation. The note was not paid when due. On September 5, 1972, Dr. Lutz agreed to surrender the promissory note to Design in exchange for a promise to assign a 5 percent equity interest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Transamerica Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dahlgren v. BlomeenWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Scurry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Nelson v. FlaggWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BrundWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buster v. GaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Khan v. BakhshNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Rubbelke v. StreckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Strevell-Paterson Co., Inc. v. FrancisUtah Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API