Legal Opinion
Rubbelke v. Strecker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 19, 1988No. 21661-9-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This action was brought to recover on an overdue promissory note; the answer was that the note was canceled. The defendants moved for summary judgment of dismissal, which was granted. The plaintiff appeals.
The facts are that Franklyn-Ross Corporation, owned 60 percent by Don Rubbelke and 40 percent by David R. Strecker, operated a separate motorcycle business known as Seattle Honda. Rubbelke sold his interest in Franklyn-Ross to Strecker, receiving in return a promissory note for $29,572.88 from Franklyn-Ross and guaranteed by Strecker. Subsequently Rubbelke and Strecker agreed that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vancouver National Bank v. KatzWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Reid v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Lutz v. GatlinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Rains v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Trane Co. v. Brown-Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- FirsTier Bank, N. A. v. TriplettNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Landmark KCI Bank v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Winkel v. ErpeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.