Clarke v. Horany
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.
This is an action brought under section 3 of the Usury Law 1 to recover treble damages for interest paid. After a trial without a jury the court gave judgment in favor of all defendants. Thereafter the court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, specifying insufficiency of the evidence as one of the grounds for the ruling. Defendants have appealed from the order granting a new trial and plaintiff has taken a cross-appeal from the judgment, invoking the procedure authorized by rule 3(b) of the California Rules of Court. *
In passing upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Commerce Trust Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Calimpco, Inc. v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- DCM PARTNERS v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Creative Ventures, LLC v. Jim Ward & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.