Natare Corp. v. Aquatic Renovation Systems Inc.

ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Settlement. 1 After full consideration, for the reasons explained below, the Motion is GRANTED. We find that the parties, having previously reached a binding and enforceable settlement agreement, must now abide by that agreement.

FINDINGS OF FACT

This case arises out of a patent dispute between Plaintiff, Natare Corporation (“Na-tare”), and Defendants, Aquatic Renovation Systems, Inc. and Stewart J. “Jason” Mart (hereafter collectively known as “Mart”).…