Pohl v. United Airlines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Defendant, United Airlines, Inc. (“United”), has requested that we enforce a settlement agreement purportedly entered into between itself and Plaintiff, Michael G. Pohl (“Pohl”). An evidentiary hearing on the motion was conducted on October 1, 1999. For the reasons discussed below, we GRANT United’s motion and order Pohl to adhere to the settlement agreement terms as negotiated by United’s counsel and Pohl’s attorney, Christopher Herrmann (“Herrmann”) of Haskin Lauter Cohen & Larue (“Firm”).
Findings of Fact
Poh…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Frank Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Willie E. Morgan v. South Bend Community School Corporation and James P. Scamman, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- William P. Wilson v. John G. Wilson, Thomas S. Wilson, and Fsw, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Kevin Armstrong v. Board Of School Directors Of The City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Janky v. BatistatosDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Rubel v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Eatmon v. City of Fort Wayne Animal Care and ControlDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Neurology and Pain Management Associates P.C. v. BuninDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- QUALITY LEASING CO INC Inc v. INTERNATIONAL METALS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.