Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1998No. 94S00-9710-CQ-552PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana has requested our response to two certified questions set out below.

Factual and Procedural Background

The certified questions arise out of a products liability suit in federal court by Michael and Jean Koval against both the manufacturer and distributer of a device that allegedly caused injuries to Michael in the course of his employment. Michael’s employer, Henk-els & McCoy (“H & M”), and H & M’s insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual, paid Michael’s medical and disability benefits under the Indiana workers’…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Michael G. Pohl v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Apple Glen Crossing, LLC v. Trademark Retail, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API