Legal Opinion

Broadwater Farms Joint Venture v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 27, 1996No. 94-1041 LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

This Fifth Amendment takings case is before the court after trial on liability. Plaintiff asserts that it is entitled to compensation because actions by the United States Army Corps of Engineers resulted in plaintiffs inability to use its property. We address two threshold questions in this opinion: 1) Whether the Corps of Engineers’ cease and desist order and settlement agreement in this case constitute final agency action; and 2) Whether the property interest affected by the Corps’ action is of such magnitude in comparison with the entire parcel to constitute a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. East Cape May Associates v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Robbins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API