City of Cleveland v. Murad
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Matia, Chief Justice.
Defendant-appellant appeals the verdict of the Cleveland Municipal Court, which found him guilty of resisting arrest. Appellant assigns two errors for review. Based on the reasons adduced below, we affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On April 6, 1990, an altercation took place between Anthony Skufca and defendant-appellant Mark Murad. Testimony at trial established the following. Murad and Skufca were both enrolled in chemistry classes at Cleveland State University. On April 6, Skufca was in the Science Research Building at Cleveland State University. Seeing Murad sitting at a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Columbus v. FraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. PembaurOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ReymannOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of Columbus v. LenearOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Michaels v. City of VermillionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Barberton v. WoodarskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.