Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose Delgado

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2006No. 05-4036Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutton, Circuit Judge

I agree with the court’s disposition of Swiecicki’s false-arrest claim and ■ write *504separately to express some reservations about the disposition of the other two counts — the excessive-force and free-speech claims.

At first blush, it would seem to me, the district court correctly rejected Swiecicki’s excessive-force claim as a matter of law because it was time barred. The statute of limitations for an excessive-force claim generally runs from the date of the abusive police conduct. That is not the case, however, if success on the § 1983 claim would “necessarily imply the invalidity of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Anthony C. Greene v. Jack Barber, Edward Hillyer, Victor Gillis, William Hegarty, and the City of Grand Rapids, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Carl Nelson v. George Jashurek, PatrolmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API