Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Lenear

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1984No. 83AP-1100PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorris, J.

Defendant, Betty L. Lenear, appeals her conviction for permitting her property to be used for the sale of intoxicating liquor, without possessing permits required by Ohio law, a misdemeanor.

The city’s first witness, a detective, testified that, on May 24,1983, she purchased an unopened can of Budweiser beer for one dollar at a home at 163 North Garfield; that she saw no liquor permits on the premises; that defendant was not present; that the person selling her the beer opened the can for her; that after consuming part of the beer on the premises she poured the remainder into a glass…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. TimsonOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. SwigerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WinstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. ReymannOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. City of Cleveland v. MuradOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Cleveland v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API