Legal Opinion

Michaels v. City of Vermillion

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 22, 2008No. 1:05cv2991PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on Defendant Police Officers Richard Grassnig’s and Michael Reinheimer’s (“Officers”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 17.) In addition, the related Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39), to which the Officers filed a response in opposition (Doc. 40), is now pending before the Court. The Defendants, Grassnig and Reinheimer, are City of Vermillion, Ohio police officers. They argue in their motion for summary judgment that they are…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Charles Austin v. Redford Township Police DepartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Mendoza v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Russell Ex Rel. Jn v. Virg-InAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rush v. City of MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  5. Cline v. City of MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API