Hawes v. Mooney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
SdRE facias ; brought to the Court of Common Pleas, and tried on tbe general issue closed to the court, before Brezvster, J. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and motion for new trial by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.
The plaintiffs were creditors of one Walters, who in February, 1868, being insolvent, made a fraudulent transfer of goods to the defendant. The object of the transfer was to conceal the goods from attachment, of which object the defendant was fully aware. He participated in, and himself suggested, the arrangement.
In March, 1871, and after the defendant had sold the goods, the plaintiffs brought suit for the recovery of their debt, factorizing the defendant. The value of the goods fraudulently transferred was $206.78. The plaintiffs recovered judgment against Walters for $267.15. The present…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Knower v. Cadden Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Epstein v. Hammerslough Clothing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.