Legal Opinion
Hygienic Health Food Co. v. Grant
California Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1921No. S. F. No. 10054PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. A. F. St. Sure, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.
The district court of appeal in the above-entitled action rendered an opinion of which the following is a portion: .
“This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment against it in an action to recover from the defendant, who was formerly its general manager and member of its board of directors, the sum of $300 claimed to have been illegally paid by the plaintiff company to the defendant as salary. The defendant had acted as such general manager for some time prior to February 1, 1918, and during that time, according to the testimony, had received a salary of $125 a month. From that time on,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rozecrans Gold Mining Co. v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consumers Salt Co. v. RigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Jones v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- American Concrete Units Co. v. National Stone-Tile Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931