Legal Opinion

Union Car Advertising Co. v. Young

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1928No. Appeal 187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The action of the learned court below, in entering judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, was, in our opinion, justified by a long line of decisions both of this court and of the Supreme Court, among which may be mentioned Tranter Mfg. Co. v. Blaney, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 379; Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hastings, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 178; Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Mfg. Co., 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 33; Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Penna. Cement Co., 221 Pa. 160, 165; S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Monroe Co. W. P. & S. Co., 221 Pa. 165, 169; Express Pub. Co. v. Aldine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Monroe County Water Power & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Murphy v. PinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lloyd & Elliott, Inc. v. LangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Philadelphia Record Co. v. SweetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. East Coast Fi. Corp. v. LinckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API