Union Car Advertising Co. v. Young
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The action of the learned court below, in entering judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, was, in our opinion, justified by a long line of decisions both of this court and of the Supreme Court, among which may be mentioned Tranter Mfg. Co. v. Blaney, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 379; Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hastings, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 178; Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Mfg. Co., 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 33; Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Penna. Cement Co., 221 Pa. 160, 165; S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Monroe Co. W. P. & S. Co., 221 Pa. 165, 169; Express Pub. Co. v. Aldine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Monroe County Water Power & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Murphy v. PinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lloyd & Elliott, Inc. v. LangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Philadelphia Record Co. v. SweetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- East Coast Fi. Corp. v. LinckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931