S. Morgan Smith Co. v. Monroe County Water Power & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 254, Jan. T., 1907, by-defendant, from order of O. P. Monroe Co., Feb. T., 1907, No. 13, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of S. Morgan Smith Company ;v. Monroe County Water Power & Supply Company. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Rule'for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 254, Jan. T., 1907, by-defendant, from order of O. P. Monroe Co., Feb. T., 1907, No. 13, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of S. Morgan Smith Company ;v. Monroe County Water Power & Supply Company. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Rule'for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Staples, P. J., filed the following opinion: Opinion and judgment of the court making absolute rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered in the above case for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The plaintiff’s action…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas:
2Cited by10 opinions
- Horwath v. SimonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Colt Co. v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Sunderland v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- W. F. Frederick Piano Co. v. LandauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.