Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1936No. Appeal, 371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtpeld, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit to recover the price of advertising under a written contract. On September 22, 1933, the defendants signed a contract, authorizing the plaintiff to insert in its newspaper, the advertisement of the defendants every other week for fourteen weeks. The contract provided, inter alia, as follows: “We further agree that this contract IS NOT SUBJECT TO CANCELLATION and guarantee to use the space in full upon the terms and on the days herein set forth, and guarantee to pay THE PHILADELPHIA RECORD COMPANY the full amount as contracted ......We are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hallowell v. LierzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Union Car Advertising Co. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cartmel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Findley v. F. D. Cummer & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API