Rogers v. City of Fort Worth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANNE GARDNER, Justice.
Introduction
In this appeal, the primary issue we must decide is whether the Texas Whistle-blower Act 1 protects an employee who reports a violation of law at the direction of his supervisor rather than on the employee’s own initiative. Because we conclude that such an employee is protected, we reverse the trial court’s judgment for the City and remand for entry of a judgment for the former employee, Fred Rogers.
Background Facts
The City employed Rogers from March 1997 to July 8, 1998 as a temporary-duty deputy marshal in the City’s municipal court. As a temporary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. HonakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Dominey v. Unknown Heirs & Legal Representatives of LokomskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Raman Chandler Properties, L.C. v. Caldwell's Creek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Town of Flower Mound v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.