Legal Opinion
Mendoza v. Central Forest Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1918No. Civ. No. 1584PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs commenced the action to enforce certain service liens against the real property belonging to defendant Central Forest Company. These liens consist of two classes: 1. Labor performed; and 2. Liens for appliances, teams, and power furnished and supplied.
The trial was by the court without a jury and plaintiffs had judgment, from which defendant Central Forest Company appeals.
Appellant states in its closing brief that “since the brief was prepared the laborers have been paid and the judgment has.been satisfied so far as it affects the laborers. ’ ’ Appellant asks that the judgment be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Caddy v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Williams v. Mountaineer Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Western Well Works, Inc. v. California Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- C. K. Eddy & Sons v. TierneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Western Elec. Co., Inc. v. ColleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Ajax Magnolia One Corp. v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.