Legal Opinion
C. K. Eddy & Sons v. Tierney
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1936No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 38,878PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTot, J.
Plaintiff and .appellant, C. KL- Eddy & Sons, a corporation, is the owner of a lot located on the southeast corner of Washington and Federal avenues, in the city of Saginaw, and in the hub of the business and commercial district of that city. Appellant proposes to lease this property to the plaintiff, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., of Akron, Ohio, and intends to erect a one and two-story brick and concrete building thereon, together with a concrete “island” containing gasoline pumps and adjoining the building proper.
The plaintiff tire company proposes to occupy and use these premises,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Caddy v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Paye v. City of Grosse PointeMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Sterling Secret Service, Inc. v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bane v. Township of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.