Fenelon v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 7, 1928:
Doerfler, J.
The defendant was convicted at the end of a long and protracted trial, and the able counsel engaged in the legal combat exhausted every reasonable means available to support their respective contentions. Great dignity and ability were displayed by the learned trial judge while presiding over the trial. We are convinced that the defendant had a fair and thorough trial and that no prejudicial error is manifest from the record.
It is urged by counsel for the defense that no motive *420existed on the part of the defendant for the procurement…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Hazleton v. Union Bank of ColumbusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Thies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. . Van TasselNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- State v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Rebholz v. WettengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Fenelon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929