State v. Miller
Wisconsin Supreme Court
REPORTED by the Judge of the Municipal Court of Milwaukee County. Miller was convicted upon an information in said court for arson; and, after denying a motion to set aside a verdict and grant a new trial, the judge of said court reported the cause to this court upon questions of law, which are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOuton, J.
It appears to us that the principle and correct rule by which the admissibility of the evidence received and involved in the two questions reported is to be determined, and the true grounds of their application to a given case, have been clearly established by previous decisions of this court, and it will therefore be profitless to review the great multiplicity of decisions of other courts which recognize the same rule, and differ only in its application.
The questions propounded by the learned judge who tried the case are: First. Did the court err in permitting the letter written by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hazleton v. Union Bank of ColumbusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Pierce v. NortheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by10 opinions
- Paulson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- McAllister v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Sowers v. TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Fischer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. OldsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.