Smith v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The defense of the defendant Smith is extremely novel, and counsel in their diligent search for cases based on similar facts have found and submitted none. The defense of lack of intention frequently arises in prosecutions for forgery, for uttering forged paper, for receiving stolen property, and other similar offenses, but there certainly seems to be a marked dearth of authorities on the subject of burglary, where the breaking and entry is in the nighttime, and where the person charged with the offense actively participates in the removal of the goods, and at the time of his arrest is found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paulson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Dietz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Fossdahl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Fenelon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by16 opinions
- Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Barrera v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Pollack v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.