Vaughn v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a trial court order denying appellant’s two most recent motions to vacate sentence under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1989). We affirm.
Appellant Vaughn and a co-defendant, Michael Anderson, were convicted of four counts of armed robbery, and Vaughn alone was convicted in addition of carrying a pistol without a license. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in an unpublished memorandum opinion and judgment. 1 He then filed pro se a motion to reduce sentence, followed a few days later by a similar motion filed by counsel. Both motions were denied by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pettaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wei Hua Wu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Minor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bradley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- James v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.