Legal Opinion
Kane v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1939No. Civ. 11096PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
Appellant applied to the trial court for a writ of .mpersedeas to stay the operation of an order denying its motion for a change of venue from the city and county of San Francisco to the county of Los Angeles, pending its appeal from said order. The application was denied, and it has now applied to this court for such a wrrit.
As will be noted from reading section 949 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the legislature has enumerated certain cases in which an appeal does not stay the operation of the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken, among them being an appeal from an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Bohn v. Better Biscuits, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Nuckolls v. Bank of California, National Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Waechter v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- McKenzie v. Los Angeles Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Searls v. Greyhound CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Yee Kee Chong v. Pacific Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Alhambra Shumway Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Gold Mine Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.