Legal Opinion
Alhambra Shumway Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Gold Mine Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1952No. Civ. No. 8135PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Defendant seeks a writ of supersedeas to stay proceedings in this cause pending its appeal from an order of the court below denying its motion for change of venue from El Dorado County to Los Angeles County or Fresno County, which motion was made upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963.) This court issued its order to show cause and its order staying all proceedings in the trial court pending the determination of the application for a writ of supersedeas.
The petition alleges that plaintiff brought an action to cancel a lease under which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Wrin v. OhlandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Rice v. SchubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- McKenzie v. Los Angeles Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friedman Bag Co., Inc. v. ShrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961