Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1945No. Civ. No. 15032PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. pro tem.
The petitioner, Dorsey Smith, seeks a writ of supersedeas to restrain, pending appeal, the execution of the judgment rendered against him (and other nonappealing defendants) in an action filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County to abate an alleged public nuisance under the Red Light Abatement Act (Stats. 1913, p. 20; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 6161).
*212The judgment provided, in accordance with the authority contained in section 7 of said act, that the designated premises be closed against their use for any purpose and so kept closed for the period of one year. An…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Nuckolls v. Bank of California, National Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- United States v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Kane v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saltonstall v. SaltonstallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Pacific Grove v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Saltonstall v. SaltonstallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957