Legal Opinion
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Golden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 22, 2009No. SCBD No. 5386PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
T1 The issues in this original proceeding for attorney discipline are: (1) whether the record before this Court is sufficient for review of the charges against the respondent and for disposition, and (2) what is the appropriate discipline. We find the record is sufficient for a meaningful review and the appropriate discipline is disbarment.
I. BACKGROUND
12 This disciplinary proceeding is before this Court pursuant to Rule 7 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 0.9$.2001, ch. 1, app. 1-A. Rule 7 provides for summary disciplinary proceedings before this Court. Rules 7.1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- United States v. Marvin GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. BieberSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZANNOTTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZANNOTTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.