Homeland Building Co. v. Reynolds
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action for declaratory relief and to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer of real property from Glenn Q. Reynolds to his wife Esther Reynolds. The plaintiff sought to have it declared that a judgment it held against Glenn Q. Reynolds was a valid lien against the property and unaffected by a homestead declaration filed by the wife.
The defendants were married in 1919 and had three children. On March 4, 1935, Mrs. Reynolds bought the property in question, which consisted of some lots with an unfinished house thereon, agreeing to pay about $1,000 therefor. At that time she paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Belieu v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Graves v. Arizona Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Oaks v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Poindexter v. Los Angeles Stone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mercantile Collection Bureau v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Warren v. RodgersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Sherry v. RossDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975